Comprehensive Research Report on Scientific Validity and Cognitive Training Effects of the N-Back Task

1. Introduction: Paradigm Shift in Cognitive Science and the N-Back Task

1.1 Historical Background of Intelligence Plasticity

In the fields of cognitive neuroscience and psychology, the question of whether human intelligence can be improved postnatally has been one of the most controversial themes for over a century. For most of the 20th century, the dominant view in psychometrics was that general intelligence (g-factor), measured by IQ, was strongly constrained by genetically determined biological limits and would not significantly fluctuate through training in adulthood. In particular, "Fluid Intelligence (Gf)," the ability to adapt to new information and solve unknown problems, was viewed as "hardware performance" that peaks with biological brain maturation and inevitably declines with age, in contrast to "Crystallized Intelligence (Gc)," which is accumulated through education and experience.

What cracked this solid dogma of "intelligence immutability" was a series of studies on working memory training, particularly the "N-Back task," appearing in the early 21st century. Working Memory (WM) is the cognitive system governing the short-term retention and manipulation of information, serving as the "cognitive workbench" underlying higher brain functions such as calculation, reading comprehension, and logical reasoning. If this fundamental processing capacity could be expanded through training, would fluid intelligence dependent on it also improve? Verifying this hypothesis (Transfer Hypothesis) constitutes the core of recent cognitive training research.

This report comprehensively analyzes vast research data from the past 20 years regarding whether the N-Back task is a scientifically "correct" training method, covering its mechanisms, evidence of effectiveness, and limitations. It details the history from the groundbreaking study by Susanne Jaeggi et al. in 2008 that sparked the "brain training boom," the subsequent replication crisis, evaluation by meta-analysis, and clinical applications for cognitive decline in ADHD and the elderly.

1.2 Purpose and Structure of the Report

This report aims not merely to summarize literature but to detailedly examine contradictions between studies and the methodological differences behind them (presence of active control groups, training duration, differences in evaluation scales, etc.) to present the current scientific consensus.

Structurally, we first explain the cognitive mechanism and neural basis of the N-Back task (Chapter 2), then follow the historical development and core of the controversy chronologically (Chapter 3). Subsequently, we discuss factors influencing training effects and the problem of strategies (Chapter 4), clinical applications for ADHD and age-related cognitive decline (Chapter 5), and finally present recommended literature (Chapter 6) and conclusions (Chapter 7).

2. Structure and Neurocognitive Mechanism of the N-Back Task

2.1 Definition and Variations of the N-Back Task

The N-Back task is a Continuous Performance Task devised by Kirchner in 1958 as a tool to assess short-term memory. Participants are presented with a series of stimuli (letters, shapes, sounds, positions, etc.) and are required to judge whether the currently presented stimulus matches the one "N steps back."

The difficulty is adjusted by the value of "N".

• 1-Back: Compare with the immediately preceding stimulus. Low short-term memory load; mainly sustains attention.
• 2-Back: Compare with the stimulus 2 steps back. Increased load on information retention and updating.
• 3-Back or more: Requires high working memory capacity and interference control.

Furthermore, it is classified by stimulus modality:

• Single N-Back: Processes only visual stimuli or only auditory stimuli.
• Dual N-Back: Visual stimuli (e.g., position of a square on screen) and auditory stimuli (e.g., sound of an alphabet letter) are presented simultaneously, and judgements for both are required against N steps back.

Dual N-Back requires simultaneous processing, retention, and updating of two independent information streams, assumed to impose an extremely high cognitive load on the prefrontal cortex and thus yield high training effects¹.

2.2 Cognitive Processes: Maintenance, Updating, and Inhibition

The decisive difference between the N-Back task and simple memory tests (span tasks) is that information continues to change dynamically. Participants must constantly execute the following cognitive processes³.

1. Encoding: Perceive the newly presented stimulus and convert it into internal representation.
2. Maintenance: Temporarily hold N items of information.
3. Updating: Whenever a new stimulus enters, discard the oldest (N+1 back) information and add the new information to the sequence.
4. Matching: Compare and decide between the current stimulus and the held N-back stimulus.
5. Interference Control: Suppress interference from similar but non-target stimuli (lure stimuli) or old information that is no longer needed.

This process of "Updating" and "Interference Control" strongly overlaps with Executive Function, the core of fluid intelligence, and is considered key to the mechanism generating transfer effects.

2.3 Neural Basis: Fronto-Parietal Network

Neuroimaging studies (fMRI) show that a wide brain region called the "Fronto-Parietal Network" activates during N-Back task performance⁴.

Jaeggi's research group explains that N-Back training elicits plasticity in this fronto-parietal network, changing dopamine receptor density and binding capacity, thereby improving performance in fluid intelligence tasks (such as reasoning problems) that use the same neural basis⁴. Specifically, the "Neural Efficiency Hypothesis" is supported, where these regions show hyperactivity (inefficient state) early in training but decreased activity (efficiency) as mastery increases, creating reserve capacity to deal with more difficult tasks⁴.

3. Evolution of Scientific Controversy: 2008 to Present

Scientific evaluation of the N-Back task has swung between enthusiastic support and severe skepticism. Here, we analyze the historical process in detail across three phases: "Discovery," "reaction," and "Integration."

3.1 Phase 1: Shocking Discovery (Jaeggi et al., 2008)

In 2008, the research team of Susanne Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, John Jonides, and Walter Perrig published a paper titled "Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory" in PNAS⁶.

• Research Design: Targeted healthy young adults with adaptive Dual N-Back training (difficulty moves up/down based on performance). Measured changes in fluid intelligence (Gf) before and after training compared to a control group. Gf was measured using Bochumer Matrizen-Test, Raven's Progressive Matrices, etc.
• Results:

1. The training group showed significantly improved Gf scores compared to the control group.
2. Dosage Effect: As the training period extended to 8, 12, 17, and 19 days, the magnitude of Gf improvement also increased⁹.

• Conclusion: Fluid intelligence, previously thought to be fixed, can be improved by specific working memory training.

This study shocked education, clinical, and business fields, triggering explosive growth in the "Brain Training" industry. Many people began practicing N-Back apps believing they would raise IQ.

3.2 Phase 2: Replication Crisis and Skepticism (2010-2013)

However, the response from the scientific community was cautious, and rigorous replication studies began immediately. In the early 2010s, reports failing to replicate Jaeggi et al.'s results followed one another.

• Redick et al. (2013): Redick et al. at Georgia Tech conducted a rigorous Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) setting an Active Control Group (group performing another intellectual task). Result: The N-Back group improved in N-Back task performance itself, but saw no significant improvement in fluid intelligence tests⁹.
• Melby-Lervåg & Hulme (2013) Meta-analysis:Analyzing 23 studies published at the time, they concluded that "Working memory training improves short-term memory capacity close to the trained task (near transfer), but there is no convincing evidence for spillover effects to distant abilities like fluid intelligence or verbal ability (far transfer)"⁹.
• Points of Criticism:

1. Control Group Issue: Jaeggi's early studies used a passive control group doing nothing, leading to criticism that improvement was due to "placebo effect" or "Hawthorne effect."
2. Measurement Tool Issue: Even if Gf improvement was seen, it might just be familiarity with the test.

During this period, scientific consensus leaned towards "N-Back does not raise IQ."

3.3 Phase 3: Re-evaluation by Meta-analysis and Modern Consensus (2014-2025)

Against negative views, affirmative researchers attempted rebuttals, and meta-analyses under more detailed conditions were conducted.

Au et al. (2014) Rebuttal

Au, Jaeggi, et al. extracted 20 studies specific to N-Back tasks and conducted a meta-analysis.

• Result: Showed a "small but statistically significant positive effect" on fluid intelligence with an effect size (Hedges' g) of about 0.24¹³.
• Claim: Previous negative meta-analyses included diverse non-N-Back training, diluting the effect. Pure N-Back training does have an effect.

Soveri et al. (2017) Comprehensive Analysis

Furthermore, Soveri et al. conducted a large-scale multi-level meta-analysis covering 33 studies and 203 effect sizes. This is currently considered one of the most reliable analyses.

• Result:
• Task-specific transfer: Transfer effect to untrained N-Back tasks was medium-sized.
• Far transfer: Transfer effects to other working memory tasks or fluid intelligence were statistically significant in some cases, but the effect size was concluded to be very small¹⁵.
• Interpretation: N-Back training is not magic that dramatically raises overall intelligence, but it surely improves performance on cognitive tasks requiring "processing similar to N-Back (updating and holding information)."

Latest Consensus (2024-2025)

Synthesizing studies and reviews from 2024 onwards³, the current scientific stance is as follows:

1. Scope of Effect: N-Back has a higher effect on improving "Attention Control" and "Sustained Concentration" rather than working memory capacity itself¹⁷. Score increases on fluid intelligence tests are likely results of improved ability to hold information without distraction during the test (focus of attention) rather than improved reasoning ability.
2. Individual Differences: Effects vary greatly by individual, potentially appearing more in those with lower pre-training ability or specific genetic tendencies.
3. Clinical Utility: Utility in clinical contexts like ADHD and dementia prevention is being re-evaluated, beyond just IQ improvement (detailed later).

4. Factors and Strategies to Maximize Training Effects

Based on scientific evidence, we explain conditions to maximize N-Back training effects and pitfalls to avoid.

4.1 Absoluteness of Adaptivity

The most important condition for the N-Back task to be effective is that the task is "Adaptive"¹⁷.

• Mechanism: If the participant's accuracy is high, raise the N level (2-Back -> 3-Back); if low, lower it. The brain must be constantly loaded at a level of "barely doable" (Zone of Proximal Development).
• Evidence: Multiple studies show little cognitive improvement in groups performing fixed difficulty (Non-adaptive) training¹⁷. Not mere repetition, but gradual increase in load triggers plasticity.

4.2 Dosage and Duration of Training

• Period: In many research protocols, standard practice is 20-30 minute sessions, 3-5 times a week, for a total of 4 to 5 weeks (approx. 20 sessions)⁴.
• Persistence: Persistence of effects is debated; some studies show persistence for months, others show disappearance soon after stopping. Continuous maintenance training is likely necessary.

4.3 Use of Strategies: Cognitive Pitfalls

When performing N-Back tasks, participants often use specific "strategies" consciously or unconsciously to raise scores. However, studies suggest these strategies may impair the transfer effect of training²⁰.

Jaeggi et al. also point out the importance of adapting the brain to the task's processing process itself without using specific mnemonics²². N-Back should be "improvement of brain's basic fitness," not "practice of mnemonics."

5. Clinical Application and Impact on Real Life

The true value of the N-Back task might lie in intervention effects for specific cognitive disorders or age-related decline, rather than slight IQ score increases.

5.1 Effect on ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder)

A primary characteristic of ADHD is a deficit in working memory and reduced frontal lobe function.

• Cortese et al. (2015) Meta-analysis: Concluded that cognitive training improves WM test scores in ADHD patients, but improvement effects on ADHD symptoms (inattention/hyperactivity behaviors) by blinded evaluators were limited²⁴. Meaning, "getting better at tests in the lab doesn't change behavior in class or workplace."
• Recent Progress (2024-2025): However, newer studies suggest adaptive Dual N-Back significantly improves verbal working memory in young adult ADHD patients and may have effects comparable to or complementary to medication in some executive functions¹⁶. Expectations are high as non-pharmacological therapy, especially for patients concerned about side effects or for cognitive domains where medication is ineffective (like executive dysfunction). There are also reports that N-Back training contributes to impulse suppression by strengthening the Inhibitory Control network²⁶.

5.2 Cognitive Decline in Elderly and Dementia Prevention

Age-related cognitive decline begins with reduced working memory capacity and processing speed.

• Early Detection: Games applying N-Back (like remembering food orders) have been shown to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in the elderly with accuracy equal to or better than traditional MMSE²⁷.
• Training Effect: fNIRS studies on the elderly suggest N-Back training changes blood flow response in the prefrontal cortex, bringing it closer to young adult patterns (or forming efficient compensatory circuits)⁵.
• Efficacy of Dual Task: Meta-analyses indicate "Dual-Task Training," performing physical exercise (e.g., exercise bike) and cognitive tasks (e.g., N-Back) simultaneously, has higher cognitive protective effects than either alone²⁹, becoming a new standard for dementia prevention.

5.3 Mental Health and Emotion Regulation

Interestingly, working memory training may contribute to improving anxiety disorders and depression.

• Mechanism: Anxiety and depression are characterized by Rumination of negative thoughts. This can be interpreted as working memory being occupied by negative information and unable to update. Strengthening "updating" and "inhibition" functions via N-Back training enhances the ability to expel negative thoughts from consciousness and return attention to the current task³¹.
• Relation to Mindfulness: N-Back and mindfulness meditation share the training of "attention control" and "suppression of mind wandering," and a hypothesis exists that combined use yields synergistic effects³².

6. Cited Papers and Recommended Books

Introducing key papers foundational to this analysis and recommended books for deeper learning.

6.1 Key Scientific Papers

The following are landmark studies in N-Back research, essential for understanding the evolution of scientific discussion.

1. ⁶ Jaeggi, S. M., et al. (2008). "Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory." *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*.

• Summary: The study that first demonstrated on a large scale that N-Back training improves fluid intelligence, causing a paradigm shift.
• *Link*: (https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0801268105)

1. ¹³ Au, J., et al. (2014). "Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis." *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review*.

• Summary: Meta-analysis integrating 20 studies, showing transfer effect to fluid intelligence is "small but significant."
• *Link*: PubMed

1. ¹⁵ Soveri, A., et al. (2017). "Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies." *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review*.

• Summary: Definitive analysis of 33 studies and 203 effect sizes. Acknowledged task-specific effects but showed cautious view on far transfer.
• *Link*: PubMed

1. ¹⁰ Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). "Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review." *Developmental Psychology*.

• Summary: Representative skeptics' paper. Severely pointed out lack of evidence for far transfer, contributing to rigor in subsequent research.
• *Link*: PubMed

1. ¹⁶ Cortese, S., et al. (2015). "Cognitive training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis..." *JAACAP*.

• Summary: Meta-analysis validating clinical effects on ADHD.
• *Link*: PubMed

6.2 Recommended Books

For readers wanting to learn deeply about the theory behind N-Back and brain plasticity.

1. *The Overflowing Brain: Information Overload and the Limits of Working Memory*

• Author: Torkel Klingberg
• Details:
• The author is the developer of working memory training (Cogmed) and a world authority in neuroscience.
• Discusses how modern humans with "Stone Age brains" should deal with the "information flood" of digital society. It explains mechanisms by which training like N-Back physically changes brain structure (cortical thickness, receptor density) very clearly for the general public. A "must-read" for N-Back practitioners to understand background theory³⁴.

2. *The Brain's Way of Healing*

• Author: Norman Doidge
• Details:
• NYT Bestseller. A document depicting the miracle of "Neuroplasticity" where the brain is not a fixed machine but can rewire itself through activity and thought.
• Introduces various approaches to brain function improvement using light, sound, movement, not limited to N-Back, transforming motivation for training into scientific conviction³⁶.

3. *The Working Memory Advantage*

• Author: Tracy Alloway, Ross Alloway
• Details:
• Presents data that "working memory predicts life success better than IQ" and introduces practical methods to train and care for working memory in daily life. Includes advice on diet and lifestyle, helping transform the entire lifestyle into something "brain-friendly" when read alongside N-Back training³⁸.

7. Conclusion

Over 20 years of scientific exploration into the N-Back task has taught us both the possibilities and limits of the brain.

In conclusion, the N-Back task is not a "panacea that magically raises IQ." Initial excessive expectations were corrected by rigorous scientific verification. However, this does not mean it is "ineffective." N-Back training is a scientifically valid method that surely improves attention control, concentration, and information updating ability by applying adaptive load to the cognitive bottleneck called working memory.

In particular, adaptive training using Dual N-Back facilitates efficiency of the fronto-parietal network and is viewed promisingly as a countermeasure against cognitive decline in ADHD and aging. What is important is not to expect immediate results or miracles, but to steadily raise the brain's basic fitness through appropriate load and continuous practice, just like muscle training.

Scientific knowledge continues to update, but the fact remains that the N-Back task is one of the most powerful "brain training tools" provided by modern cognitive neuroscience.

---

Disclaimer: This report is for informational purposes and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a specialist for treatment of medical conditions such as ADHD or dementia.

Cited References

1. Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://forum.artofmemory.com/t/solving-the-dual-n-back-game-with-memory-techniques-brain-workshop/27547#:~:text=It's%20a%20game%20where%20each,is%20constant%20through%20the%20game.))
2. How to Play Dual N-Back: Tutorial for Beginners - BrainScale.net, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://brainscale.net/app/dual-n-back/how-to-play
3. Exploring the n-back task: insights, applications, and future directions - Frontiers, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1721330/full
4. Intensive Working Memory Training Produces Functional Changes in Large-Scale Fronto-Parietal Networks, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5724764/
5. Age-related cerebral changes during different n-back tasks: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study - PubMed Central, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11521811/
6. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory - PNAS, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0801268105
7. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory - PNAS, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.0801268105
8. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory - PubMed - NIH, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18443283/
9. Dual N-Back Replication Studies Show Little to No Impact on Fluid Intelligence - Reddit, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/cogsci/comments/12a7b5i/dual_nback_replication_studies_show_little_to_no/
10. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review - PubMed, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22612437/
11. (PDF) Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of "Far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review: - ResearchGate, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305743706_Working_Memory_Training_Does_Not_Improve_Performance_on_Measures_of_Intelligence_or_Other_Measures_of_Far_Transfer_Evidence_From_a_Meta-Analytic_Review
12. Is Working Memory Training Effective? A Meta-Analytic Review - American Psychological Association, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/dev-49-2-270.pdf
13. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis | Scott Barry Kaufman, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/au-et-al2014_nback-training-gf-meta-analysis.pdf
14. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis - PubMed, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25102926/
15. Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies - PubMed, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28116702/
16. Boosting Working Memory in ADHD: Adaptive Dual N-Back Training Enhances WAIS-IV Performance, but Yields Mixed Corsi Outcomes - MDPI, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/15/9/998
17. Dual n-back training increases the capacity of the focus of attention - PubMed, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23184506/
18. Dual N-Back Working Memory Training in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Comparison to Processing Speed Training - PMC - PubMed Central, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4820261/
19. How to Get the Most Out of Your Dual N-Back Training, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://nbackchallenge.com/articles/how-to-get-the-most-out-of-your-dual-n-back-training
20. Dual n-back] Do i need to avoid this strategy ? : r/DualnBack - Reddit, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, [https://www.reddit.com/r/DualnBack/comments/1960rd7/dual_nback_do_i_need_to_avoid_this_strategy/
21. Am I chunking or using a strategy? : r/DualnBack - Reddit, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/DualnBack/comments/bmkh83/am_i_chunking_or_using_a_strategy/
22. What strategy should I use to get the best out of dual n back training? : r/DualnBack - Reddit, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/DualnBack/comments/1bdqzx9/what_strategy_should_i_use_to_get_the_best_out_of/
23. The Most Effective Training Strategies For Dual N-back Working Memory Training, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.iqmindware.com/improve-executive-control/capacity-training/training-strategies/
24. Cognitive training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis of clinical and neuropsychological outcomes from randomized controlled trials - PubMed, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25721181/
25. Cognitive Training for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Neuropsychological Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials - King's College London Research Portal, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/cognitive-training-for-attention-deficithyperactivity-disorder-me/
26. Exploring N-Back Cognitive Training for Children With ADHD - PMC - NIH, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6445784/
27. A Gamified N-back App for Identifying Mild-cognitive Impairment in Older Adults | JMA Journal, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.jmaj.jp/detail.php?id=10.31662%2Fjmaj.2024-0217
28. The Long-Term Efficacy of Working Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials - ResearchGate, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341997577_The_Long-Term_Efficacy_of_Working_Memory_Training_in_Healthy_Older_Adults_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta-Analysis_of_22_Randomized_Controlled_Trials
29. Effects of a 6-month dual-task, power-based exercise program on cognitive function, neurological and inflammatory markers in older adults: secondary analysis of a cluster randomised controlled trial - NIH, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11872956/
30. Does the combination of exercise and cognitive training improve working memory in older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis - PeerJ, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://peerj.com/articles/15108/
31. Neurobiological Changes Induced by Mindfulness and Meditation: A Systematic Review, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11591838/
32. (PDF) Mindfulness meditation alters neural activity underpinning working memory during tactile distraction - ResearchGate, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344394349_Mindfulness_meditation_alters_neural_activity_underpinning_working_memory_during_tactile_distraction
33. Noticeable gains after N backing, meditation and juggling - Google Groups, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://groups.google.com/g/brain-training/c/N7u8uTp1Krs/m/vjHCHRnmJBwJ
34. The Overflowing Brain - Shin-yo-sha, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.shin-yo-sha.co.jp/book/b455742.html
35. The Overflowing Brain - Cogmed Working Memory Training, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.workingmemory.training/kogumedono-kenkyuu/tokeru-kuringubagukyouju--herena-u-esutabaguhakase/obafurosuru-nao
36. Book recommendations for a beginner wanting to learn about neuroscience, more specifically neuroplasticity? : r/neuroscience - Reddit, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/neuroscience/comments/7vldwd/book_recommendations_for_a_beginner_wanting_to/?tl=ja
37. 'The Brain's Way of Healing' - HONZ, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://honz.jp/articles/-/42984
38. Rakuten: Working Memory Books, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/%E3%83%AF%E3%83%BC%E3%82%AD%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B0%E3%83%A1%E3%83%A2%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC+%E6%9C%AC/209171/
39. E-book] Train Your Brain's Working Memory! | NHK Publishing, Accessed Dec 15, 2025, [https://www.nhk-book.co.jp/detail/000243008120000.html